Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?
Paid work associated with digital platform businesses (in taxi, delivery, maintenance and other functions) embodies features which complicate the application of traditional labour regulations and employment standards. This article reviews the extent of this type of work in Australia, and its main characteristics. It then considers the applicability of existing employment regulations to these ‘gig’ jobs, citing both Australian and international legislation and case law. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the scope of traditional regulations, minimum standards and remedies in the realm of irregular digitally mediated work. Regulators and policymakers should consider how to strengthen and expand the regulatory framework governing gig work. The article notes five major options in this regard: enforcement of existing laws; clarifying or expanding definitions of ‘employment’; creating a new category of ‘independent worker’; creating rights for ‘workers’, not employees; and reconsidering the concept of an ‘employer’. We review the pros and cons of these approaches and urge regulators to be creative and ambitious in better protecting the minimum standards and conditions of workers in these situations.
|Author(s)||A. Stewart, J. Stanford|
|Year of publication||Aug, 2017|
|Journal||The Economic and Labour Relations Review|
|Volume, Number||28, 3|
|Website / Document||Visit|
- Platform Workers in Europe, 2018. A. Pesole, M.C. Urzí Brancati, E. Fernández-Macías, F. Biagi, I. González Vázquez.
- Does informal learning at work differ between temporary and permanent workers? Evidence from 20 OECD countries, 2018. M. Ferreira, A. Grip, R. van der Velden.
- Automation, digitalisation and platforms: Implications for work and employment, 2018. E. Fernández-Macías.
- More Flexible Yet Less Developed? Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Labor Flexibilization and Gross Domestic Product in Crisis-Hit European Union Regions, 2018. G. Grekousis, S. Gialis.
- Dual Labour Market Intermediaries in Italy: How to Lay off “Lemons” - Thereby Creating a Problem of Adverse Selection, 2018. P. Barbieri, G. Cutuli.
- Van sociale werkvoorziening naar Participatiewet, 2018. K. Sadiraj, S. Hoff, M. Versantvoort.
- Rechtspositie van oproepkrachten (verder) versterkt? 2018. E.W. de Groot, M.S. Houwerzijl.
- Ongelijkheid en zelfrespect: het effect van inkomen en arbeidspositie, 2018. R. Wielers, P. van der Meer, M. Willems.
- Effectiviteit van de Brug-WW en scholingvouchers – Tussenrapportage 2018, 2018. Panteia.
- De participatiemythe; een drieluik over dubieuze beleidsassumpties, 2018. W. Trommel.